Opinion
Waiting for a political tsunami
There is a people’s movement
for democracy on in the Maldivian atoll.
by | Aishath Velezinee

Meeting of the leading opposition,
MDP |
Back in 2001, the People’s Majlis, the
Parliament of the Maldives, fervently rejected the introduction
of political parties in Maldives, with one MP declaring that
such an introduction would be tantamount to “playing
with fire”. Others echoed similar sentiments, arguing
that the public was not ready – that allowing political
parties would tear the social fabric and encourage religious
rifts in the hundred- percent Muslim nation. The application
for registration of the Maldivian Democratic Party (MDP),
which had initiated the debate, was rejected.
Just four years later, in June 2005, the Parliament
voted unanimously to allow political parties, with the MDP
being the first to complete the registration process. This
was followed quickly by the registration of Dhivehi Rayyithunge
Party (DRP, or Maldivian People’s Party), led by President
Maumoon Abdul Gayoom and consisting of top government brass
and business leaders; an Islamist party called Adalat (Justice);
and more recently, the Islamic Democratic Party, spearheaded
by a former military officer.
Since the 2001 vote, adverse events and political
blunders of the rulers had drastically intensified pressure
for reform, both from internal and external sources. As the
MDP began to agitate for democratic reform, the international
media, which had generally seen the country as little more
than an equatorial paradise, became more aware of a darker
side to
the islands.
In September 2003, the atoll nation was shocked
by the killing of a 19-year-old prisoner in Maafushi jail.
The body of the teenager, brought over from jail to the hospital
in Male was kept hidden from family and friends as word spread
that he had met a brutal death. As the body, completely covered
in the traditional white shroud, was being shown under military/
police guard, the aggrieved mother tore off the burial cloth,
exposing undeniable signs of torture. Family, friends and
all concerned were shocked beyond belief. Within minutes,
crowds gathered spontaneously all over Male, and there were
random acts of violence targeting the High Court, the Office
of the Election Commissioner, the Parliament chambers, and
military/police buildings. The military reacted by using teargas
to disperse the crowds. That same afternoon, prisoners in
Maafushi jail who had witnessed the torture revolted and police
resorted to using fire-power, killing two. More died later
of wounds. Addressing the nation via radio and television
late that night, President Maumoon Abdul Gayoom claimed that
the authorities were forced to shoot as the rioting in the
jail was threatening national security!
Just weeks after these events, President Gayoom
began his sixth five-year term in office. By then, the public
had shaken off their political lethargy and the president
was forced to rethink his strategy. One of the first moves
in his new term was a sweeping amnesty freeing practically
all prisoners, including those serving life sentences. Only
those on life sentences for the 1988 coup attempt and for
murder remained in jail. He reshuffled the cabinet, discarding
two members, and two months later, in December 2003, set up
the Maldives Human Rights Commission. The People’s Special
Majlis, the Maldives’ Constitutional Assembly, was convened
in July 2004 to carry out constitutional reform to strengthen
democracy. These changes, however, have done little to relax
the political tension because despite the talk of reform and
democracy, there has been negligible change on the ground.
The public as well as the international community has turned
skeptical of change coming from within the government.
Controversy related to procedure continues
to dog the Majlis to this day. Some MPs had wanted elections
by secret ballot, while the more conservative members insisted
on the traditional practices involving a public showing of
hands. Despite worries that public votes would allow for intimidation
tactics, voting was through raise of hands. Opposition and
some independent members staged a walkout and went to the
President’s Office demanding to meet him. Till today,
there is mistrust between the government and opposition, in
and out of the Parliament. Even constitutional reform, which
both parties propagate, is protracted as each accuses the
other of filibustering.
Freedom debates
12 August 2004, which came to be popularly known as Black
Friday, saw the Maldives’ largest-ever public gathering.
Almost a quarter of Male’s residents gathered at Republic
Square, overlooking the main police and military headquarters,
as leaders of the ‘freedom debates’ were arrested.
This series of debates carried out in the public space every
evening had begun as a response to a call by President Gayoom
for popular dialogue on reform, and had continued until one
evening, when the crowds chanted a call for President Gayoom’s
resignation. This was the beginning of “Maumoon Isthiufaa”,
or “Resign Maumoon”, a popular call today.
On Black Friday, the security forces acceded
to public demand and released those arrested earlier that
evening. By then, the crowds had swelled and the rally had
gained momentum. The demonstrators started listing names of
more political prisoners and insisting that they too be released.
Using a megaphone provided by the security forces, speaker
after speaker addressed the crowds voicing their concerns,
demanding reforms, their demands culminating in the unpalatable
“Maumoon Isthiufaa”.
The rally continued for a full 20 hours. In
the end, nearly 200 people were arrested – including
the current Minister of Finance Qasim Ibrahim; former SAARC
Secretary General and Cabinet Minister Ibrahim Hussain Zaki,recently
elected Vice President of the opposition MDP; former Attorney
General Mohamed Munavvar; MDP leaders Dr. Hussein Rasheed
Hassan and Ahmed Shafeeg. All were members of the Constitutional
Assembly. By 15 August, three days after the rally, the government
was describing the protests of 12-13 August as a coup attempt.
Those arrested were eventually released and all charges dropped
in the name of national unity, following the catastrophic
tsunami of 26 December 2004.
In the meantime, work of the Constitutional
Assembly has been sluggish. It took over a year for its members
to agree on a set of rules of procedure. During that time,
both the Commonwealth and the European Union have stressed
areas where immediate progress could have been made –
allowing freedom of expression and establishing an independent
judiciary as a top priority even before any constitutional
reform is recommended. Allowing political party formation
had also become a priority.
In May, the president requested a re-reading
of the Constitution and the new Attorney General, Dr. Hassan
Saeed concluded that there was no “absolute barrier
to the registration of political parties, and could be overcome
relatively simply by a package of legislative measures and
executive devices within the framework of the existing Constitution.”
The Parliament agreed.
Keeping up pretence
Since then, political parties have become a part of everyday
reality in the atoll nation. Party rallies take place throughout
the country in attempts to boost membership. In a country
where there are few cultural events or avenues for popular
entertainment, such gatherings have become a focus of public
attention. Hours are spent either promoting or criticising
the government, depending on the event’s organiser.
Yet despite this social integration, there is still little
concrete involvement by the parties in the political process.
The rallies have politicised much of the public and brought
a transformation of political attitudes. But the conservative
political culture and the strong grip on society by President
Gayoom, with his eight appointed members in Parliament, and
16 appointed members and whole cabinet in the Constitutional
Assembly, throttles the opposition voice. Indeed, the chairman
of the leading opposition party, MDP, Mohamed Nasheed (Anni),
forcibly dragged off the Republic Square on 12 August 2005
while he and four others were marking the first anniversary
of Black Friday, has been charged with treason and terrorism.
Nearly six months since political parties were
allowed to register, the legislation necessary for the proper
functioning, such as confirming their right to put up candidates
for elections, are yet to be created. The first elections
since the setting up of political parties - bi-elections for
three vacant seats in the Constitutional Assembly –
held on 24 December 2005 forbade candidates from running on
party tickets. All had to formally register as independent
individual candidates although it was known to the authorities
as well as the public that the candidates were indeed representing
parties. The pretence that no parties were involved was kept
up by the Election Commission. Three parties, the DRP, MDP
and Adalat put up a candidate each for the three constituencies,
and with a high voter turn-out for a bi-election, MDP candidates
won the two seats of Male, the capital, and urbanised Addu
island; whilst the seat of the more isolated Shaviyani Atoll
went to President Gayoom’s DRP candidate.
The opposition is out in force in the Maldives,
and they see a full democracy within reach. “Six months,”
says the MDP cryptically, giving an ultimatum to President
Gayoom’s government. Reforms in the pipeline or not,
if there are no real changes by June 2006, the party says
it will lead a nationwide civil disobedience campaign. Can
President Gayoom forestall a political tsunami?
<< Back
to Table of Contents
|