| Cover
feature
Small but not so beautiful
Promoted as a sustainable,
‘eco-friendly’ way to produce electricity, small-scale
hydroelectric projects have run into public opposition in
Himachal Pradesh.
By : Manshi
Asher and Prakash Bhandari

Prakash Bhandari |
| To run dry: a Saal Valley watermill |
The Saal Valley is tucked away
in the eastern part of Himachal Pradesh’s Chamba District.
It is home to the Hull Nala, a stream that meanders through
the hills for around twenty kilometres before meeting up with
the Saal River. This eventually joins the mighty Ravi, one
of the five rivers of Punjab, near the town of Chamba.
In many ways the Hull Nala
is no different from most other Himalayan streams –
the same unique interaction with the land, forests and people.
Traditional watermills line its banks, extensive irrigation
channels feed terraced vegetable farms, children bathe in
silver pools, and lush oak forests run parallel along steep
slopes. As with practically every other stream and river in
Himachal, it is seen as a potential source of electricity.
But unlike most other river valleys, the inhabitants of the
Saal Valley have in recent months come out onto the streets
of Chamba to register their discontent with how the state
is utilising their river.
Perhaps more peculiar is that
the local opposition to two hydroelectric projects, Hull I
and II, has succeeded in receiving a sensitive response from
the state government. Due to growing pressure, this past May
the principal secretary, J P Negi, took the rare step of establishing
a district-level review committee to look into the grievances.
Comprised of senior officials from all concerned departments,
on 6 June, this review committee held a public hearing at
Jadera, to seek the opinions of the people of the three panchayats
that would be affected by the Hull projects. On 25 June, the
committee visited each of the affected sites to study the
possible fallout of the projects for the area. In a state
that has been on a spree of commissioning ‘hydel’
projects, this latest turn of events was an interesting one.
Pure economics
Over the past decade, Himachal Pradesh came to be known as
the ‘power state’, boasting as it does a hydroelectric
potential of nearly 21,000 megawatts. At the moment, nearly
6070 MW are being harnessed, while projects for an additional
7600 MW are currently under construction. By the end of the
11th Five Year Plan, in 2012, state officials estimate that
Himachal will be producing 11,000 MW.
Of the 21,000 MW total potential,
officials have classified around 750 MW as coming from ‘small
hydro’ – meaning the small ‘run of the river’
projects that produce less than 5 MW each and can make do
with weirs rather than dams and reservoirs. In such projects,
the river is diverted and channelled such that a strong downward
rush can be used to generate power. The power created by these
small-scale constructions is not kept for the surrounding
villages, however, but rather is sold by the producers to
the State Electricity Board. Nonetheless, these types of installations
have been increasingly and enthusiastically promoted as eco-friendly,
cost-effective, decentralised structures. To attract them
into the hydroelectric sector, the Shimla government is now
offering private power producers incentives in the form of
easy land-acquisition procedures and speedy clearances. Last
year, 56 small hydel projects, with a cumulative capacity
of 155 MW, were entrusted to private producers, at a total
cost of INR 2.7 billion.
But small is not necessarily
beautiful, as has become increasingly evident from the growing
public protest against many of these projects. As is the case
in all mountain regions, it is the small streams – on
which these small-scale projects are being built – that
sustain isolated communities, as well as the fragile ecosystems
that make up the hillsides. In addition to the worries over
economic sustainability, local communities are enraged at
the involvement of private entrepreneurs from outside the
state; they see these business groups as merely eager to lap
up government incentives in order to make quick and easy profits.
Local populations do not stand to gain much from the massive
amounts of money being spent on the small hydro plants that
sell to the grid. Barring a few small hamlets, after all,
nearly all of Himachal is already electrified, mostly through
large state-government projects. The new projects will be
catering to the growing power requirements of other North
Indian states, such as Punjab, Haryana and Delhi.
Says Akshay Jasrotia, an activist
from Kangra District who is at the forefront of the movement
against a small-scale hydel project on the Binwa, a tributary
of the Beas River: “It is the subsidies which attract
the small players into these projects. On the one hand, the
Ministry of Non-Conventional Energy, with funding from the
Global Environment Facility, is subsidising up to 40 percent
of the costs of each of these projects. On the other, many
of these are going in for the [Kyoto Protocol’s] Clean
Development Mechanism.” Jasrotia says that the cost
of setting up a one-megawatt project is INR 30-50 million,
while the returns are up to INR 60,000 per day – meaning
that after a year and a half, such an installation is theoretically
all profit, a timeframe that is even further shortened by
government giveaways. “If we take into account the subsidies,
the profit margins are huge,” Jasrotia says.
Of course, it has long been
understood that it is only by creating economic incentives
that electricity production can be made to appear increasingly
‘green’. At the same time, there is a cynical
irony at play when sustainability subsidies are used for projects
that cause destruction at the very local level. It is this
disconnect that has triggered intense protests against small-scale
hydroelectric projects in Himachal, including on the Hull
Nala.
Hull I & II
In 2001, Shimla began negotiating contracts for the construction
of two hydroelectric projects on the Hull Nala. Hull I was
located upstream at Jadera; and Hull II, 20 metres downstream
from where the Hull I would release its water. (In Himachal,
several small hydroelectric plants are often set up along
one stream to maximise the utilisation of the river’s
flow.) The companies involved were the Hyderabad-based Hull
Hydro Power, a part of Astha Projects (India) Ltd, and the
Delhi-based First Hydropower Ltd, with investments of INR
188.4 million and INR 150 million, respectively. (Astha is
also overseeing another hydel project in Dehar, Chamba.)
In keeping with official promises,
the certification processes have been relatively straightforward.
Both of the Hull projects have received clearance from the
State Electricity Board. Furthermore, since both projects
are small, they do not require environment clearances from
New Delhi. While the Central government has been pushing for
decentralisation of clearance mechanisms, at present adequate
procedures and institutional structures do not exist at the
state level to ensure that the environmental costs of projects
are assessed in detail. Two additional local clearances are
also required, however, from the state Forest Department and
the Irrigation and Public Health Department. While Hull I
has received both of these, Hull II has not, with doubts being
raised about the probable impact of water diversion on water-supply
schemes, most critically for the drinking-water supply to
Chamba town. But the most overwhelming obstacle to both of
these projects remains the public opposition that they are
facing from the upriver residents of the Saal Valley.
The protests have been focused
on the impact of the Hull hydro projects on three particular
aspects of life in the area: fishing, traditional watermills
and the area’s forests. The diversion of the river into
channels for power generation will mean a loss of access to
the Hull Nala for fishing communities. Furthermore, along
the banks of the Hull Nala there are currently more than 65
traditional watermills, or gharats, which have been used for
generations for grinding flour. These form an important part
of the local economy and culture. A diversion of the Hull
Nala’s waters would render the gharats useless, as has
been the experience of communities elsewhere in Himachal.
But the aspect of the Hull
projects that has been singularly crucial in sparking off
protest has been the diversion channel, which would run through
Jadera’s thick oak forest. This woodland was regenerated
and protected through great effort during the 1980s, under
the government’s Greening of the Himalayas project.
Today, the forest has several species of flora that cater
specifically to the area’s livestock-rearing communities,
the Gujjars and the Gaddis. The Saal Valley area is known
for its milk, ghee and honey production, with Jadera and the
village of Silla Gharat fulfilling roughly half of Chamba
town’s demand for dairy products. These villages are
already facing shortages of green fodder (particularly during
the winters), for which the communities are almost completely
reliant on the oak forests. Despite this dependency, Hull
Hydro Power managed to get clearance from the state Forest
Department to acquire a patch of more than two hectares of
the forest, and to fell its slow-growing oak trees.
The Forest Department officials
have estimated that only 243 trees would need to be cut down
in order to clear the way for the Hull I project, while locals
maintain that almost 2000 trees will go once the project activity
starts. Says an activist, Khemraj Khanna, with a Chamba-based
rights organisation: “Once the project starts, labourers
from outside will be brought into the area. They will be forced
to fell trees for their firewood and other needs. Thus, the
pressure on the forest will increase manifold.” District
Forest Officer D R Kaushal, who recently visited the site
as part of the state’s new review committee, not only
admits that the tree felling will be dramatic, but cautions
that “the digging and dumping will lead to more destruction
and landslides in the area.”
Slightly downstream, the objections
to Hull II have come from several quarters. The 24 villages
that make up the Saal Valley’s Baraur panchayat currently
support a thriving local economy based on vegetable cultivation.
Each family earns around INR 30,000 per year from growing
fruits and vegetables, and the area has regularly won the
Department of Agriculture’s annual Best Vegetable Growers
Award. But the seven elaborate kuhals, or irrigation channels,
which feed the Baraur area’s need for water, will run
dry once the Hull Nala waters are diverted to the power project.
Energised by their past successes, Baraur citizens had been
hoping that the state government would focus on creating new
irrigation schemes, which could further benefit the area’s
economy. Instead they feel they will be cheated of the fruits
of their labour thus far.
Doubts have also been raised
about the projected capacity of the Hull Nala projects, and
the stream’s level of discharge is said to have been
overestimated. This could mean that the electricity eventually
generated will be significantly lower than what the government
promises. Unfortunately, these are not crucial considerations
for the private companies involved, because the subsidies
in place will easily offset any loss. Claims activist Jasrotia:
“Even if the project does not generate electricity through
the year, the break-even point can be reached within 100 days
of functioning.” The disturbances to the local communities
and environment, however, will remain year-round, and the
environmental damage will lead to loss of livelihoods and
migration out of the area.
Good governance
Amidst the rising voices opposing small-scale hydroelectric
projects in Himachal Pradesh, none has been as consistent
as the one against the Hull plans. Before the matter was handed
over to the review committee in June, area communities and
activists had approached the district-level grievance committee,
which is headed by the local MLA and state minister Harsh
Mahajan. The subject received substantial attention from the
local and national media and, in March 2007, local political
representatives took up the matter in the state assembly.
Two months later, the district-level review committee was
created.
The review committee is made
up of a variety of district- and state-level representatives,
each of whom has been part of a rigorous regimen of inspection,
assessment and grievance redressal. While its mandate and
actions thus far have been commendable, the committee’s
long-term responsibilities remain difficult. Says chairman
Gopal Sharma: “Government officials in the state are
sensitive, and in this case we have observed that the concerns
around both the ecosystem and livelihoods are real. But we
also have to keep in mind the larger picture of national development.”
Other problems look set to
crop up during the course of the committee’s work. For
one, there is a feeling among members that, since Hull I has
already received the necessary approvals, it will be difficult
to do anything substantial to slow or alter its construction.
In response to this, however, communities have raised questions
regarding the importance given to local self-governance. While
panchayat representatives have been consulted regarding the
project, they are not formally part of the committee; the
final decision-making is the state government. The work on
Hull I was initiated despite the continual refusal by the
gram sabhas (village assemblies) of the panchayats of Jadera,
Silla Gharat and Baraur to give a no-objection certificate
to the project.
The pressure to cancel the
Hull II project, meanwhile, has received increased weight
due to the possibility that Chamba town’s drinking-water
supply would be affected. Either way, all eyes are now on
the eventual recommendations of the committee. How the interaction
between local communities, private companies and the committee
works out may offer a unique lesson for future tangles between
affected communities and development-minded governments. It
will also test the Shimla government’s oft-repeated
commitment to good governance – and show whether ‘good
governance’ truly means one that is participatory, and
able to keep in firm perspective the concerns of the people
and their environment.
|