Shia-Sunni:A rift engineered and institutionalised

The conflict between Shias and Sunnis, though ancient in its origins, has come to the fore with dramatic intensity on the international stage with the execution of ousted Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein. Sectarian strife rooted in centuries of hostility between these two sects of Islam has often taken the form of virulent public campaigns and violent clashes, too. Yet never before did it impinge on global consciousness, and consequently in the realm of public affairs, as is happening now after the US-led occupation forces in Iraq overturned the rule of the minority Sunnis – symbolised by Saddam Hussein – and foisted a puppet regime of Shias.

Initially, the US found the Shia-Sunni conflict useful to sustain and boost opposition to Hussein's vestigial forces and reinforce a government that could appeal to the majority Shias. However, as the conflict unravelled and violence between the Shia and Sunni militias spiralled out of control, Washington, DC has come to realise that deepening this divide would weaken its grip on Iraq, and that the militias of both the sects have to be reined-in in order to achieve a measure of order. More importantly, neighbouring Shia-dominated Iran could exploit the conflict to leverage the crossborder Shia axis against US hegemony in the region. This is fraught with dangerous consequences for the US – not only in keeping a lid on Iraq but taking on Iran, too, as it has chosen to do.