Between rhetoric and reality

Published on: 

A serious criticism of SAARC is its non-implementation of decisions taken. The organisation has been criticised variously for being "ritualistic", a "magnificent paper tiger", a "political white elephant", a "talk shop of no consequence", "suffocatingly slow", a "military convoy in a mountainous region", "a regional pastime", a "club of tongues", a "bureaucratic den" and "a losing business venture, yet one you cannot close." The list could go on.

The SAARC process had already begun to face such criticism by the early 1990s, to which the leaders started to react in the various summits. For example, in Dhaka in 1993, the leadership approved recommendations for adopting a more "business-like and functional approach in the conduct of Summit meetings." But the slide has continued. The level of implementation and degree of commitment to decisions taken remains appallingly dismal. The so-called rhetoric-reality gap is ever widening, enough to damage the 'SAARC spirit' itself.

Loading content, please wait...
Himal Southasian
www.himalmag.com