War of Words: (L-R), Waheed and Nasheed
War of Words: (L-R), Waheed and Nasheed

February in History

The Maldives’ Commission of National Inquiry report is a history written by the victors, but it forces all parties to look to the future, not the past.

Daniel Bosley is a journalist and blogger working on the Maldives. He was earlier the editor of the local newspaper Minivan News, and co-founded the history and culture website Two Thousand Isles. His work has also appeared in international outlets including The Economist, Reuters and Himal Southasian. He currently lives and works in London.

Published on

What happened in the Maldives on 7 February this year has been the subject of constant debate ever since. The completion of the investigation into these events last month did little other than confirm the one thing that everybody already knew: that the winners of the power struggle that day were those who found themselves in charge come 8 February. The old maxim that history is written by the victors appeared to have been borne out as the Commission of National Inquiry (CoNI) not only absolved all those in the current government of any wrongdoing in the suspicious ousting of former president Mohamed Nasheed, but also laid upon Nasheed the blame for all the events preceding his resignation.

After a quasi-legal investigation, the final report read more like a political justification for the removal of an opponent than a genuine attempt to untangle the confusion surrounding the events, which many believe to have been a coup d'état. After half a year, the addition of two new members, and an additional month's delay, the commission's credibility was already under question. It came as no surprise, then, that the final draft brought no real agreement over the circumstances surrounding Mohamed Waheed Hassan's ascension to the presidency.

Loading content, please wait...
Himal Southasian
www.himalmag.com