Two years turned the Indian subcontinent into Southasia. Between 14 August 1947 and 4 February 1948, India, Pakistan (its eastern part would later become Bangladesh), and Sri Lanka all gained independence from the British Empire. Amid the optimism of independence, the new states were comparable in population health and development indicators. Their progress since has been different.
Non-communicable and communicable diseases ravage Southasia. Tobacco and pharmaceutical industries are exploiting weak legislation to nurture new markets. There is little pride in the progress of surgery, health research, or postgraduate education. Yet one challenge dwarfs all these: the desperate state of maternal and child health. The scale of morbidity and mortality caused by neglect of mothers and children is driving the region to disaster. And unless regional priorities switch from nuclear weapons to maternal and child health the progress that is being made in community development, by integrating care in refugee camps, by the creators of the Jaipur foot and the Karachi ambulance service, and on cricket fields will count for nothing.
The answers to the region´s problems may already be with us. Despite a civil war, Sri Lanka has the best health indicators in the region (also beating those of most other countries with comparable incomes), with average life expectancy at 73 years, infant mortality at 16 per 1000, and maternal mortality at 30 per 100 000 live births. India´s Kerala state has achieved health and demographic indicators far ahead of Indian national averages, with similar levels to Sri Lanka; over 80 percent of infants receive all routine vaccines by 1 year, use of family planning services is high, and population growth is steady at replacement levels.
The genesis of this success is an object lesson for the entire region. Soon after independence Sri Lanka decided to invest heavily in education and health as a cornerstone of socioeconomic development. Gains in education have been impressive, with literacy rates for both sexes exceeding 90 percent. Similarly, Kerala has the highest literacy rates among all Indian states. Both have maintained policies to achieve gender and social equity, reflected in outstanding health and economic indicators for women. In Sri Lanka, women constitute over half the work force.
Political will and grassroots support have stimulated development, underpinning largely consistent health and investment strategies. Soon after independence, both governments introduced agrarian reform that ended feudal land holdings, thus alleviating poverty and promoting equity. An important policy plank has been a focus on primary care –especially maternal and child health — through a multilayered health system with adequate provision of basic services at community level. Sri Lanka does not have a single magnetic resonance scanner in the public sector, epitomising a deliberate public focus on primary and secondary care. By contrast, many other countries in Southasia boast expensive tertiary care institutions (where sophisticated imaging is to be found), with low funding of primary and rural care.
This progress has not gone unchecked. Improvements in socioeconomic conditions prompted growth of the private sector in Kerala, as public institutions failed to keep up with the population´s demand for quality care. A recent review of community health workers found gaps in their ability to adapt from implementing vertical national programmes to problem solving at local level. Others have criticised health in Kerala as “low mortality high morbidity”, with little attention paid to diseases of transition. Local communities, in typical fashion, have assumed the responsibility for resolving these issues.
What can the rest of Southasia learn from Kerala and Sri Lanka? Firstly, given leadership, investments in education and primary care can provide a framework for human development. Secondly, gains have been achieved against a background of participatory democracy; indeed, social consciousness is crucial in overcoming the menace of corruption. Thirdly, maternal and child health is critical to development.
Can the rest of Southasia follow this lead? Yes, but doing so requires setting aside political differences, resolving regional conflicts, and creating an atmosphere that reduces spending on defence and nuclear arsenals. This may sound like wishful thinking but how else will we create hope from the despair of untold child death, wanton neglect of girls and women, and a rich elite feasting on the misery of millions in poverty? Health professionals in the region have an opportunity to join hands across national boundaries, cast aside historic divisions that suffocate progress, and begin to realise this vision of something better — a vision crystal clear in the heady days of independence, since lost in the intervening years of poverty, conflict, and nationalism.
Zulfiqar Bhutta, Samiran Nundy and
In the British Medical Journal
(online edition at http://www.bmj.com)