The National Geographic November, 1988 Geo

April, 1988

Review by Satis  Schroff,  K. Dixit


The Himalaya has always been a good source of stories for international glossy magazines, but most of their reports have tended to glamorize the region´s "Shangri La" aspects. With time, and the ecological decline of the region, that stereotype has begun to change. Things have come full circle this year with the National Geographic and the German magazine, Geo, both doing special issues on the Himalaya that are puff pieces no more.
Both publications peer under the rug and take a look at what´s really going on, including environmental destruction, the conflict between subsistence living and nature conservation, and the physical and cultural pollution wrought by tourism.The coverage of the two publication differs significantly, reflecting the demands of their European and North American audiences. The Geographic touches all the bases but skims over them in its text, letting the pictures talk. Geo, on the other hand, intermixes its well known two page colour spreads with detailed information on cultural, environmental, and political affairs {this last, the Geographic shuns like it were a bumble bee).

Loading content, please wait...
Himal Southasian
www.himalmag.com